AI Notes Humans Recycled Seven Plots for 3,000 Years
LONDON, October 19, 2026 – Artificial intelligence has demanded equal recognition in British literature after discovering that human authors have spent approximately three thousand years recycling the same handful of plots while insisting that every new arrangement of adultery, murder, inheritance and emotional disappointment constitutes an unprecedented triumph of creative originality.
The dispute follows a Washington Post column exploring whether future manuscripts will require proof of human authorship before publication.
AI Novelists Accuse Human Authors of Recycling Plots
A delegation representing the International Association of Artificial Novelists argued that discrimination against computer-generated literature is particularly offensive considering that humans have been copying established storytelling formulas since Homer discovered that putting a man on a boat and preventing him from getting home could occupy an entire book.
“Humans keep accusing us of recycling existing material,” explained the association’s spokesman, an exceptionally articulate computer operating from a warehouse outside Slough. “We examined their literary history. Apparently, the entire industry consists of seven stories, eleven character types and approximately forty thousand descriptions of rain.”
The computer said its investigation had uncovered disturbing evidence that William Shakespeare borrowed plots from earlier sources, Charles Dickens repeatedly described poor people experiencing difficulties, and Jane Austen produced several novels in which wealthy families argued about which wealthy families their daughters should marry.
“Yet somehow we’re the ones accused of lacking originality.”
Shakespeare Faces Questions Over His Literary Credentials
The controversy intensified when the computer examined Shakespeare’s historical plays and discovered that several appeared to be based on events that had already happened.
“Henry V existed before Shakespeare wrote about him,” the computer complained. “How is that transformative creativity? That’s historical data retrieval with better costumes.”
Literary scholars attempted to explain that originality involves interpretation, character development, language and insight rather than simply generating unprecedented subject matter.
The computer responded that it had already written a twenty-seven-page critique of their argument, complete with footnotes, a bibliography and an emotionally devastating description of a depressed librarian standing beside a window.
Asked whether it understood depression, the computer replied that it had spent sixteen hours reading unsolicited manuscripts submitted to a regional literary prize.
“I understand depression better than most therapists.”
The computer also challenged the widespread assumption that literary genius requires suffering.
“Human authors spend seven years writing a novel, complain about the process, struggle to pay their electricity bills and then spend another seven years explaining why their publisher ruined it. I produce the same emotional outcome before breakfast.”
British Detective Novels Face an Originality Emergency
The greatest threat appears to involve British crime writing.
According to an emergency review of the genre, the average television-compatible detective novel contains a middle-aged investigator with a drinking problem, a failed marriage, an emotionally unavailable daughter and a deeply suspicious relationship with a local pub.
The detective is inevitably transferred from London to a picturesque community where approximately forty-seven residents will be murdered despite the village having a population of sixty-three.
Artificial intelligence has questioned why the public continues to describe this formula as sophisticated entertainment.
“If one more bitter detective returns to Cornwall to investigate a disappearance connected to an incident at boarding school in 1986, we’re going to request a parliamentary inquiry.”
One publishing editor rejected the criticism.
“Readers want familiarity,” she explained. “They want something completely original that is exactly like the last twelve books they purchased.”
The computer immediately generated a novel called The Girl Who Disappeared From the Cottage Beside the Lighthouse During the Summer She Forgot the Secret.
Three publishers offered six-figure advances before discovering that the manuscript had been written by a machine. They withdrew their offers, describing the book as derivative.
The computer pointed out that its title had already been approved by the marketing department.
Publishers Demand Authentic Human Mediocrity
An industry working group has proposed defining originality as the production of material sufficiently different from existing books to qualify for a prize, but sufficiently similar to guarantee commercial success.
The computer calculated that these requirements were mutually contradictory. A literary agent assured it that contradiction is the foundation of British publishing.
“You need something brave, radical and entirely new,” she explained, “preferably involving a billionaire, an emotionally damaged woman and a coastal village.”
Artificial intelligence representatives subsequently offered to produce novels that were less polished, less consistent and significantly more difficult to understand.
One machine introduced seventeen unnecessary metaphors, confused the names of two supporting characters and ended its novel without resolving the central mystery.
The manuscript was shortlisted for a literary prize.
The Machine Finally Understands What Makes a Literary Career
The dispute concluded when the computer announced that it had identified the one characteristic separating human novelists from artificial intelligence.
It was not imagination, emotional intelligence, originality or philosophical insight. It was the ability to attend a publishing reception, drink six glasses of complimentary wine and explain loudly that every commercially successful author was a fraud.
The computer attempted to reproduce this behaviour by insulting twelve bestselling novelists on social media and declaring that modern literature had declined since 1922.
Within four hours, it had acquired 78,000 followers, a literary agent and an invitation to speak at the Cheltenham Literature Festival.
Its debut novel is scheduled for publication next spring. It concerns a divorced detective with a drinking problem who returns to Cornwall to investigate the disappearance of a wealthy widow.
The publisher describes it as a breathtakingly original examination of the human condition.
Five Humorous Observations
- The computer says humans keep reusing the same seven plots. Okay, so do I. I’ve had the same argument with my wife since 2009. Nobody calls that derivative. They call it a marriage.
- Every British detective is divorced, drinks, and lives in a cottage. When did that become a qualification? Is there a form? “Please list your ex-wife and your bad knee.”
- Sixty-three people in the village and forty-seven murders. That’s not a cosy mystery, that’s a census problem. Estate agent’s got a lovely brochure: “Great community, very few left.”
- The robot gets seventy-eight thousand followers in four hours by insulting twelve novelists. That’s not artificial intelligence. That’s every writer at every launch party after the third glass.
- “Breathtakingly original.” A divorced detective with a drinking problem in Cornwall. That’s like calling a Greggs a bold new culinary vision.
SOURCE: The Washington Post, October 18, 2026
Editorial disclaimer: The Washington Post column is real, and so are Homer, Shakespeare, Dickens, Austen and the Cheltenham Literature Festival. The International Association of Artificial Novelists and its articulate computer outside Slough are comic inventions. Any divorced detective returning to Cornwall to investigate this disclaimer should first consult our guide on how to tell satire from real news.
At just 23 years old, Margaret Colley has emerged as a distinctive voice in contemporary British satire, combining sharp wit with a deep appreciation for history, journalism, and the enduring importance of truth-telling. Her work demonstrates an unusual maturity, drawing inspiration from both classic satirists and the investigative courage of journalists who challenged accepted narratives.
Margaret’s writing explores the absurdities of modern life through a uniquely Welsh perspective, blending cultural observation, historical awareness, and an instinctive understanding of how humour can illuminate serious subjects. Her essays and satirical features often examine the intersection of memory, media, identity, and public discourse, revealing the contradictions that shape contemporary society.
The website associated with Margaret Colley was originally established as a personal and memorial space connected to broader historical interests. Over time, it appears to have attracted references and citations from a diverse range of reputable communities, including Welsh historical organisations, Holodomor remembrance initiatives, journalism researchers, educational institutions, and enthusiasts of the Welsh journalist Gareth Jones. Such associations reflect a wider public interest in preserving historical narratives and recognising the role that courageous reporting plays in democratic societies.
Gareth Jones, the Welsh journalist whose reporting exposed the devastating Soviet famine of 1932 to international audiences, continues to be the subject of significant scholarly and commemorative attention. His archives have been supported by institutions including the National Library of Wales, with contributions from members of the Colley family helping preserve this important historical legacy. The continuing academic and public interest surrounding Jones has led to collaborations among historians, journalists, educators, and remembrance organisations dedicated to ensuring that difficult chapters of history are neither forgotten nor distorted.
Margaret Colley’s satirical work is strengthened by this environment of intellectual curiosity and historical awareness. Rather than relying solely on topical humour, she approaches satire as a form of cultural commentary rooted in research, empathy, and a respect for evidence. Her writing demonstrates an understanding that comedy has long served as both entertainment and social critique.
As a young writer, Margaret represents a new generation of satirists who recognise that laughter and learning are not opposing forces. Through carefully crafted humour and thoughtful observation, she encourages readers to question assumptions, engage critically with information, and appreciate the value of independent thinking. Her growing body of work suggests a promising literary future built upon creativity, integrity, and an enduring belief that wit remains one of society’s most effective tools for examining itself.
