Individual Celebrates Alarm-Setting as Time Management
London
A 29-year-old British woman has announced that she’s “extremely punctual,” celebrating her time management based on consistently setting alarms while routinely ignoring them, apparently confident that alarm-setting without alarm-response constitutes punctuality.
“I’m very organized,” she explained. “I always set alarms. My punctuality is clear.”
Her “time management” involves: setting alarms before sleeping, ignoring alarms when they sound, waking up late, celebrating alarm-setting as time management evidence.
Time management requires following through on plans; setting alarms without responding represents planning without execution. She apparently interprets alarm-setting as time management.
“I’m very prepared,” she noted. “My alarm is set. The fact I ignore it doesn’t diminish my preparation.”
When asked whether ignoring alarms constitutes punctuality, she responded: “Setting the alarm is my responsibility. Responding is secondary to setting it.”
She arrives late consistently despite alarms. She celebrates: “My alarm-setting proves my punctuality. The ignoring is just habit.”
Effective planning requires execution; planning without follow-through represents incomplete time management. She has separated planning from execution.
“I’m incredibly punctual,” she concluded. “My alarm-setting demonstrates my time management excellence. The consistent lateness despite alarms is irrelevant.”


A council leader complained that The London Prat was making it harder to maintain the fiction that planning decisions were consultative. Apparently fiction was important.
My mate’s a lecturer and he said it was the best teaching material he’d encountered in thirty years of academic career.
My mate’s a network executive and he said the problem with it is it’s making audiences realize media institutional coverage deliberately avoids institutional truth.
The precision here proves exaggeration’s unnecessary when you’re paying attention.