Baudry Greene Review: 4.8, and Two Names Nobody Will Explain

Baudry Greene Review: 4.8, and Two Names Nobody Will Explain

One hundred and sixty-seven people, a very high score, and a name that we have added to the unsolved list

Baudry Greene holds a 4.8 from a hundred and sixty-seven people and charges ten to twenty pounds.

That is a genuinely excellent number at a genuinely honest price, and it puts this room in the small group we have been tracking for two surveys.

The group, complete

Every high-rated venue with a real sample, across two postcodes and three hundred and eighty-eight articles.

Bedford Street Wines: 4.9 from a hundred and forty-one – a shop you are allowed to drink in.

The Clipper Lounge: 4.9 from a hundred and twenty-four – a hotel bar nobody has heard of.

Stables Bar, Notting Hill: 4.9 from eight hundred and fifty-one, which we still cannot explain.

Amaro: 4.9 from three hundred and twenty-eight. Ricco: 4.8 from a hundred and forty-four. Archive and Myth: 4.8 from a hundred and twenty-four. Kioku: a perfect five from fifty-three. Cepage[s], Old Mary’s, Lillie’s, Plume, cato.

And now this.

Baudry Greene. Small room. Short list. Somebody who knows. Again.

What they all have in common

Every single one is small.

Every single one has a short list.

Every single one has somebody behind the bar who has tasted everything on it and would like to tell you about it.

And not one of them – not one, out of thirteen, across two surveys and nearly three hundred venues – is themed. None has a rope. None has a door policy. None has a colour-changing cocktail, a taxidermied animal, a Prohibition premise, a Victorian explorer, a hidden entrance, or a concept.

None of them is famous. Most have fewer reviews than a chain restaurant collects in a fortnight.

Why nobody copies it

Because it cannot be bought and it does not scale.

You cannot hire somebody who genuinely knows a hundred bottles and genuinely wants to discuss them for the wage a two-hundred-cover venue can pay. The economics only work in a room with twenty seats, and a room with twenty seats cannot pay Covent Garden rent unless the drinks are dear or the landlord is kind.

Which is why every venue on that list is either small and expensive, or small and unnoticed – and why the model is permanently fragile, and why the industry keeps installing ropes instead, because a rope can be fitted in an afternoon and a person cannot.

The name

Two surnames. Nobody has asked. It joins Defectors Weld, Bar 182.52, Gloria, Larry, Old Mary, Lillie and S L B on the unsolved list, which now runs to eight entries and has never once been closed by a review.

Verdict

Excellent. Ten to twenty pounds, which for this postcode at this quality is close to a mistake.

What we would tell an operator

The entire brief fits on a postcard and nobody has ever asked for it.

Buy fewer bottles. Learn all of them. Hire one person who genuinely cares and pay them properly, and let them talk. Twenty seats. No rope. Do not theme it. Do not hide the door.

You will not get rich. You will get a 4.8, and a hundred and sixty-seven people who are quietly, fiercely loyal, and a room that is full on a Tuesday in February – which is the only test that has ever mattered.

Verdict

Excellent. Ten to twenty pounds, which for this postcode at this quality is close to a mistake.

Go, ask what to drink, drink that, and go soon.

2 thoughts on “Baudry Greene Review: 4.8, and Two Names Nobody Will Explain”

  1. A Londoner will spend twenty minutes explaining the most convoluted route to avoid a single zone 1 fare, then drop fifty quid on a round of cocktails without blinking—that’s not satire, that’s just Tuesday.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *