Turtle Bay Review: A 4.8 From Six Thousand People

Turtle Bay Review: A 4.8 From Six Thousand People

One of the biggest numbers in this survey, and it belongs to a chain, and we have to explain that

Turtle Bay in Camden holds a 4.8 from six thousand two hundred and thirty-nine people.

That is one of the highest numbers on a large sample anywhere in this survey, and it belongs to a chain.

And we have to deal with that, because we have spent six postcodes being condescending about chains.

What we have been saying

That chains drift. That the star rating measures the gap between expectation and delivery, and the gap moves with the pavement – which is why almost every chain in this survey scores differently in different districts.

Five Be At Ones: 4.6, 4.6, 4.3, 4.5, 4.6.

Five Cocktail Clubs: 4.7, 4.6, 4.5, 4.4, 4.4.

Two Bootleggers: 5.0 and 4.3, and they are the same bar.

Turtle Bay. A 4.8 from six thousand people. That is not an accident.

Why this holds

Because volume normally punishes, and it has not punished here.

Six thousand reviews is six thousand separate evenings, and somewhere in that number there was a bad Saturday, a broken cistern, and a member of staff having the worst week of their life.

All of it is in the average. Permanently. And it has still come out at 4.8.

That is very difficult to do and it is not luck.

What they are actually doing

Promising something small and delivering it every single time.

Loud room. Bright colours. Enormous menu. Extremely long happy hour. Music at a volume that makes conversation effortful, which is deliberate.

And nobody is going to make you feel stupid for ordering wrongly.

Which we have argued in six postcodes is worth more than any cocktail, because ratings are almost never destroyed by what is in the glass – they are destroyed in the ninety seconds before it arrives.

An experience cannot be delivered on demand. An activity can.

And a two-for-one cocktail at half past six on a Tuesday is an activity.

The rum

Which is the actual product, and which is worth taking seriously.

Rum was a waste product. It is distilled from molasses – what is left when the sugar has been crystallised out – and it was made because nobody knew what else to do with the residue.

And the sugar plantations of the Caribbean were operated by enslaved people, in conditions that killed them at a rate requiring continuous replacement, and rum was both a by-product and a currency of that system.

It was traded for people on the African coast. That is not a controversial reading; it is the documented structure of the business.

The Prat wrote this at Cottons and at the Sugar Loaf, and it is not a footnote to the drink. It is where the drink comes from.

Verdict

What the chain is actually good at

Consistency, which is invisible and which is extremely expensive.

To hold a 4.8 across six thousand people you need the same training, the same stock, the same measures, the same recipes and the same recruitment – and every one of those is a system that somebody has to build, maintain and audit, forever.

The independent bar with a 4.9 achieved it with one exceptional person behind the counter. That is a wonderful thing, and it does not scale, and it cannot be bought.

A chain holding a 4.8 across six thousand people has done something different and considerably harder to explain – and the trade press has never once written about it, because it is not a story.

Verdict

Excellent number, honestly earned, and the happy hour is the point.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *