Two Brewers Review: The Gay Bar Existed Under a Criminal Law

Two Brewers Review: The Gay Bar Existed Under a Criminal Law

A room where a community that could not exist in public went anyway, and it was raided

The Two Brewers holds a 4.3 from ten hundred and ninety-four people, and it is one of the longest-standing gay venues in South London.

And a room like this one existed, for most of its history, under a criminal law.

The Labouchere Amendment

Which was passed in 1885, and which criminalised acts between men in terms so broad that it was known as the blackmailer’s charter.

Because it did not need much. It did not need evidence of very much at all.

And it was on the statute book until 1967.

The gay bar. It existed under a criminal law. And people came anyway.

Who it took

Oscar Wilde was convicted under it in 1895 – two years’ hard labour, the treadmill, the plank bed – and it destroyed him, and he died in Paris at forty-six.

And Alan Turing was convicted under it in 1952.

The man who had done more than very nearly anybody to win the war was prosecuted, and chemically castrated, and stripped of his security clearance.

He died two years later.

Eight postcodes and thirteen hundred and forty-four articles: the same law took the best writer and the best mathematician of their respective generations.

And people came anyway

Which is the thing this article is for.

Because a community that could not exist in public needed a room.

And it went to a pub – because a pub was warm, and it was lit, and it was open, and it asked you for no document at the door.

And they were raided. Regularly. Names were taken, and printed, and men lost their jobs and their families over it.

Which is the finding

Every community that has had nowhere to go has built its institutions in a room where drink is served.

The friendly societies. The trade unions, which were illegal. The Corresponding Societies, tried for treason. The coffee houses, which Charles II tried to close in 1675 and backed down within days.

The pub was infrastructure.

And they are closing

Which is the part that matters now.

Because LGBT venues in London have closed in very large numbers over the last two decades – and the causes are the ones this survey keeps listing.

Property values. The residential value of the site exceeding the value of the business. And the fact that younger people drink less.

Nothing in London is destroyed by malice. It is destroyed by arithmetic.

And 1967 did not fix it

Which has to be said, because the date is treated as an ending and it was not one.

Because the 1967 Act was extremely narrow.

It applied only in private, only over twenty-one, and it explicitly excluded the armed forces and the merchant navy.

And private was interpreted very strictly indeed – a hotel room was not private, and a room with a third person in it was not private.

And prosecutions for related offences rose afterwards, which is not what anybody expects.

The age of consent was not equalised until 2000, and Section 28 was on the statute book until 2003.

Which is within the lifetime of most people reading this.

Verdict

Honest number, and it is still here.

2 thoughts on “Two Brewers Review: The Gay Bar Existed Under a Criminal Law”

Leave a Reply