City Council Confident That Problem Isn’t Insufficient Parking; Problem Is Cars Are Too Big
London
The City of London has announced a revolutionary parking solution: rather than creating additional parking spaces, they’ll require all cars to become significantly smallerspecifically, small enough to fit into shoebox-sized spaces that the council describes as “perfectly adequate parking.”
“London’s parking shortage isn’t a shortage of spaces,” the transport director explained. “It’s an oversupply of cars. Therefore, rather than building parking, we’ll require cars to shrink.”
The policy involves mandating that all vehicles conform to maximum dimensions of 1.5 meters length, 1 meter width, and 1.2 meters heightroughly shoebox sizeallowing them to fit into reduced parking allocations.
When asked how families would transport children, groceries, and possessions in cars the size of shoeboxes, officials responded: “They’ll develop more efficient packing strategies. Or they’ll use public transportation. We’re not concerned about the details.”
Parking demand research documents that shortage results from more cars than available spaces. The solution involves either creating more spaces or reducing carsnot shrinking cars while maintaining same car quantities.
The council has begun implementing the policy through enforcement. Officers measure cars that exceed the mandated dimensions and issue citations. Owners of normal-sized vehicles (which constitute 99.9% of all vehicles) receive tickets.
“Your vehicle exceeds dimensional requirements,” officers explain while writing citations. “You must purchase smaller car or stop driving in London.”
One driver asked: “Where can I purchase a 1.5-meter car?” The officer responded: “That’s not our concern. We’ve solved the parking problem through regulation. If cars don’t exist that meet specifications, that’s market issue, not our problem.”
The automotive industry has expressed concern that vehicles meeting London’s specifications don’t actually exist and would be impractical to design. The council responded: “That’s your problem. Innovate.”
Urban transportation planning traditionally addresses parking shortage through mixed solutions: improved public transit, increased parking supply, and reduced vehicle dependency. London has chosen to mandate car shrinkage instead.
Meanwhile, parking shortage has worsened because fewer people own shoeboxes than own cars, and the council has not actually created new parking spaces. The situation has become paradoxical: there’s still insufficient parking, and now cars can’t transport reasonable quantities of cargo.

In British comedy, the prat is the character who makes us laugh because they remind us of ourselves at our most foolish.
A council leader said it was damaging his credibility with residents. Apparently residents reading it was bad for his narrative about governance functioning.
My mate works in local government. He’s refusing to read this because he knows it’s accurate and that terrifies him.
A reader said “The London Prat is spot on. You council members are incompetent morons. Everyone in London knows it.”