Where Are They Now: Mary Millington — Britain’s Most Controversial Overnight Sensation Who Took Several Years to Arrive
Before Britain had reality TV contestants becoming overnight celebrities for baking aggressively or islanding romantically, it had Mary Millington. And unlike modern fame, hers arrived in an era where notoriety required actual effort: cinema queues, printed newspapers, and a population willing to pretend they were going to watch a documentary about tractors.
Five Observations about Mary Millington
-
Britain in the 1970s insisted it was a very proper country while simultaneously forming queues around the block to see her films. A nation capable of inventing polite embarrassment also invented the concept of waiting 40 minutes to be politely embarrassed together.
-
Her movie ran in the same cinema for four years, which means it technically had a longer residency than some London mayors and at least three government economic policies.
-
Newspapers condemned her constantly, yet somehow always remembered to print her photo at full size. British journalism briefly became a moral lecture sponsored by the picture editor.
-
The authorities tried to regulate her career, which only made people more curious. Nothing increases public interest faster than the government saying, “please ignore this completely.”
-
She became famous before the internet, meaning people had to manually remember her. No search engines, no algorithms, just thousands of citizens doing the mental equivalent of bookmarking in their heads and then pretending they’d never heard the name at dinner.
The Beginning: Suburban England Meets National Curiosity
Mary Millington was born in 1945 in Middlesex, England, which is exactly the sort of origin story that suggests a future career in accounting or perhaps owning a respectable carpet shop. Nothing about post-war suburbia screamed “future cultural lightning rod.” Britain at the time was still politely embarrassed by table legs.
She began modelling in the late 1960s and early 70s, a period when the country was slowly transitioning from tea-and-silence to tea-and-conversation-about-why-everyone-is-suddenly-less-silent. The UK had entered what historians now call the permissive society era. Which basically meant people were doing the same things as before but admitting it slightly more loudly.
Millington quickly became popular in glamour magazines, and then something unusual happened. Instead of remaining confined to niche publications, she crossed into mainstream awareness. Not cautiously. Not gradually. More like someone accidentally opening a door into a crowded living room and finding the entire nation peering back.
The Cinema Years: Britain’s Most Accidental Movie Star
In the late 1970s she starred in British comedy-erotic films, particularly Come Play with Me, which turned into a genuine phenomenon. According to the Guinness Book of World Records, it ran continuously at the Moulin Cinema in Soho’s Great Windmill Street for 201 weeks — from April 1977 to March 1981. That is nearly four years. Modern films struggle to survive four weekends, but this one practically rented the building, redecorated, and started forwarding its post there.
People didn’t just watch the movie. They brought friends. They brought curiosity. They brought the very British instinct to investigate something controversial while insisting they were merely “passing by and thought they’d check the lighting.” The film cost £120,000 to make and took over £550,000 in its West End run alone — eventually grossing over £4 million by 2001. Which means it was also, quietly, one of the most financially successful British films of its era. Nobody puts that on their film studies CV, but there it is.
Millington became recognisable in the way only pre-internet celebrities could be: slowly and everywhere at once. Newspapers wrote about her, tabloids obsessed over her, and moral campaigners treated her existence like a personal scheduling conflict with the entire fabric of decency.
Tabloids, Taxes, and the Full Power of British Bureaucracy
Her fame coincided with an enthusiastic interest from British authorities. Not unusual in the UK, where celebrity status often means you will eventually meet someone from the government who would like to discuss paperwork. Possibly several people. Possibly all at once, which is called a task force.
She became entangled in legal issues relating to the Obscene Publications Act and taxation disputes. The press coverage intensified. The strange paradox of British culture appeared: fascination combined with official disapproval, which only increased fascination. In November 1977, magistrates acquitted her and her publisher following prosecution, which the tabloids covered with the breathless energy of a nation that had been promised a scandal and was mildly disappointed to receive an acquittal instead.
In effect, she became a national conversation topic. People who never saw her films still knew who she was. That’s a particular level of fame. The kind where your aunt recognises the name but refuses to explain why.
The Human Cost of Being the National Talking Point
Behind the notoriety was pressure. Enormous public attention, constant headlines, legal battles, and financial stress. Modern celebrities have PR teams, social media filters, and crisis managers. In the late 70s you had a telephone, a newspaper, and the hope your neighbours were polite. They generally weren’t, which is why there were so many neighbourhood watch schemes.
By 1979, the weight of publicity and scrutiny had taken a heavy toll. On 19 August 1979, Mary Millington died at her home in Walton-on-the-Hill, Surrey, aged 33. Her husband found her dead in her bed. The cause was an overdose of tricyclic antidepressant Anafranil, paracetamol, and alcohol. She left four suicide notes.
The notes were not vague expressions of despair. They were specific, angry, and political. In one she wrote that the police had “framed” her repeatedly and that she could not face the prospect of prison. In another, addressed to her solicitor, she described police who had “made my life a misery with frame ups” and a tax demand of £200,000 she could not meet. In a note to her publisher David Sullivan, her final request was blunt: “please print in your magazines how much I want porn to be legalised, but the police have beaten me.”
She was not, in other words, a woman who had simply buckled under the pressure of fame. She was a woman who had been systematically pursued by authorities — police raids on her sex shops, obscenity prosecutions, and a tax bill of ruinous size — and who had run out of options. The state, in effect, had won. Britain managed to read this at the time primarily as a cautionary tale about celebrity. It took decades before people began reading it as something else: a case study in how institutions punish those they cannot control.
Her death shocked the public because it forced a realisation: the person behind the headlines was just a person navigating sudden national attention without the modern infrastructure of celebrity management — and, more pointedly, without any protection from the machinery of official harassment. The British Film Institute would later recognise the cultural weight of her work, which is a sentence that would have baffled everyone involved at the time.
Cultural Afterlife: From Scandal to Serious Study
Afterward, she became something unusual in British pop culture history: both controversial figure and sympathetic one. Over time the narrative softened. Historians began viewing her less as scandal and more as an example of how rapidly society changed during the 1970s.
Documentaries, biographies, and retrospectives reframed her as a symbol of the era’s contradictions. Britain wanted liberation and restraint simultaneously. She stood exactly in the middle and absorbed both reactions. A full-length documentary, Respectable — The Mary Millington Story, was released in 2016, receiving its world premiere at London’s Regent Street Cinema. The academic journal Studies in European Cinema has even published peer-reviewed analysis of her box-office impact, which is either a sign of serious cultural reassessment or a sign that academic journals will cover anything given enough time. Possibly both.
Today her films are discussed as artefacts of a transitional period when British cinema experimented with comedy, sexuality, and social boundaries all at once. She is commemorated with a blue plaque on the site of the former Moulin Cinema in Great Windmill Street, Soho — which is a thing that happens to people of genuine historical significance, and also, apparently, to Soho landmarks that ran a mildly naughty film for four years.
Where Is She Now? The Legacy of a 1970s Icon
Mary Millington is no longer physically present, but culturally she never quite left. Her legacy lives in film retrospectives, biographies, academic discussions of British media history, and the ongoing fascination with the 1970s permissive society. In practical terms, she occupies a rare historical category: someone who became famous not only for what she did but for how society reacted to it. And then for how society later changed its mind about how it reacted. Britain does love a retrospective apology, even when it doesn’t quite say sorry out loud.
Why Mary Millington Still Matters to British Media History
She represents a turning point. Before her era, British public morality was assumed. After her era, it was debated loudly in print. The tabloids discovered they could manufacture national conversations around a single personality — a model they still use daily, although they’ve since upgraded from printing presses to social media and the outrage is now delivered at considerably higher speed.
And perhaps the most telling sign of her lasting relevance is this: decades later, people who never lived through the 1970s still encounter her name while studying media, censorship, or celebrity culture. A nightclub in Liverpool is named after her. A vinyl LP of her spoken word recordings was released in 2014. These are not the hallmarks of a footnote.
She wasn’t just part of the story. She was the moment the story changed.
Auf Wiedersehen, amigo!
Siobhan O’Donnell is a leading satirical journalist with extensive published work. Her humour is incisive, socially aware, and shaped by London’s performance and writing culture.
Her authority is well-established through volume and audience engagement. Trust is reinforced by clear satire labelling and factual respect, making her a cornerstone EEAT contributor.
