How London commuters weaponize their suffering into conversational superiority
The Competitive Misery of Discussing Commutes: A One-Upmanship Study
Londoners have transformed the commute into a competitive sport where the winner is whoever had the worst journey. This isn’t conversation; it’s combat. You arrive at the office having endured a 45-minute delay. Your colleague smiles knowingly. They’ve prepared their response all morning.
The Commute Hierarchy
Tier 1 (Pathetic): “The District Line was a bit slow today.”
Tier 2 (Respectable): “Signal failure at South Ealing.”
Tier 3 (Impressive): “Complete suspension and I had to walk through Shepherd’s Bush.”
Tier 4 (Mythical): “Got onto a packed Northern Line train, and someone’s emotional support peacock escaped at King’s Cross.”
Each tier is carefully calibrated to establish dominance through suffering. The person with the worst commute wins. Victory tastes like contempt.
The Exaggeration Arsenal
“Well, my bus never showed, so I waited 40 minutes in the rain, and then when it arrived, it was going in the wrong direction.” Meanwhile, they’re lying. The bus arrived in 12 minutes, but the lie is necessary to maintain competitive standing. As BBC Work-Life analysis shows, Londoners add approximately 15-20 minutes to their actual commute times in conversation.
The Validation Dance
Colleague A: “Yeah, but did you get stuck behind someone eating a full breakfast on the escalator?”
Colleague B: “Amateur hour. I was behind someone having a complete argument on their phone about custody arrangements. In complete detail. For 12 stops.”
Colleague A nods respectfully. They’ve been bested. Their commute suffering is insufficient.
The Genuine Disaster Hierarchy
Strikes are mid-tier (everyone suffers, no bonus points). Extreme weather is premium (you can reference it for months). But the absolute pinnacle? “I got stuck on a train for three hours between stations.” This is the conversational equivalent of summiting Everest. You’ll mention it casually for the next decade.
The Unspoken Truth
Everyone’s commute is approximately the same level of miserable. The Central Line is always rammed. The Piccadilly Line is consistently delayed. The buses are predictably congested. But admitting this would require acknowledging that Londoners are all suffering equally, which would destroy the entire competitive framework.
The competitive misery serves a psychological function: it transforms involuntary suffering into a status symbol. You didn’t choose to endure this torturebut at least you can weaponize it socially. The Guardian’s urban analysis remains diplomatically silent on how the London commute has become the primary basis for workplace bonding.
SOURCE: Bohiney Magazine’s study of commute culture
https://bohiney.com/
Alan Nafzger was born in Lubbock, Texas, the son Swiss immigrants. He grew up on a dairy in Windthorst, north central Texas. He earned degrees from Midwestern State University (B.A. 1985) and Texas State University (M.A. 1987). University College Dublin (Ph.D. 1991). Dr. Nafzger has entertained and educated young people in Texas colleges for 37 years. Nafzger is best known for his dark novels and experimental screenwriting. His best know scripts to date are Lenin’s Body, produced in Russia by A-Media and Sea and Sky produced in The Philippines in the Tagalog language. In 1986, Nafzger wrote the iconic feminist western novel, Gina of Quitaque. Contact: editor@prat.uk
