The Grand Claim: Violent Protests Because Trump Needed an Excuse
In what may be the most dramatic plot twist since “maybe the butler did it”, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi announced (with absolutely no supporting evidence, mind) that the country’s protests became violent and bloody on purpose just so President Trump could have a pretext to interfere. That’s right. Bloody protests didn’t happen because ordinary people were upset. They allegedly happened to give someone else a plot point. 🎬
The logic here is reminiscent of someone who buys a lottery ticket because they want an excuse to take a holiday, or a toddler who smashes a vase so they can argue for extra pudding. 🎭
Araghchi insists the situation is now “under total control” — a phrase that, in international relations, usually means “please don’t look too closely at what just happened.” 😌
Top-Tier Creative Attribution

Let’s unpack this like a seasoned BBC panel show host:
Protests: Started over severe economic grievances and swiftly turned nationwide — evidence shows tens of thousands on the streets, economic despair and growing calls for change. 📊
Government Reaction: Internet blackout, widespread arrests and deadly force, according to external observers. 🚫
Iran’s Foreign Minister: Claims all that wasn’t spontaneous unrest — no no no. It was strategic escalation designed to please Donald Trump. 🎪
Proof Provided: Allegedly footage of weapons being strategically distributed to protesters (because who doesn’t hand out free weapons like leaflets at a village fete?). 🔫
This is the sort of reasoning that would convince a pigeon to invest in crypto. 🐦💸
Trump’s “Intervention Options”
President Trump, for his part, has been weighing “very strong options“. In plain English, that means “a few dozen military, diplomatic and Twitter responses”, because the only thing the world loves more than uncertainty is uncertainty with extra permutations. 🤔
In one breath the US says it prefers diplomacy, and in another it talks about “options on the table” that look suspiciously like fireworks outside a Bonfire Night celebration. 🍿
Turkey Intervenes With Caution and a Cup of Tea
Meanwhile, Turkey — not part of this unofficial arm-wrestling competition — has politely suggested that foreign intervention might not be the best idea — like someone at a party gently reminding everyone they’re at a library. 📚
One can almost hear the Turkish foreign ministry sigh in perfect RP English: “Perhaps, chaps, let’s settle this over scones instead?”
A Surreal Rotation of Logic

Let’s line up the logic, shall we?
Protests happen — real footage, real unrest. ✅
Violence and fatalities occur — also documented. ✅
Iran’s FM says it wasn’t about the economy or real grievances, it was a strategic move to help Trump. 🤨
Trump’s response includes “diplomacy” just after threatening military action. 🤷
If this were a Monty Python sketch, it would be hailed as a triumph of absurdism; in real life, it’s just another Monday in geopolitics.
The World’s View: Does Anyone Else See What Just Happened?
International human rights organisations have raised concerns about the internet blackout and lack of independent verification of casualties. That’s not a conspiracy theory, that’s basic fact-checking with civilian Wi-Fi. 📡
In contrast, Iranian state media is showing pro-government rallies and insisting everything is calm. This dual narrative would be impressive if it wasn’t so reminiscent of every sitcom where two siblings swear they “didn’t touch the biscuits”, while crumbs lead straight to them.
A British Summary (With Tea and Candour)
In summary:
There are protests because life was economically rubbish in Iran — yep, that’s documented. ✅
There has been a violent crackdown and internet blackout — also documented. ✅
Iran’s Foreign Minister claims all the bloody bits were because Trump needed an excuse — no evidence provided. ❌
The US is simultaneously saying it wants peace and the loudest megaphone in the room. 📢
Everyone else is either cautioning restraint or adjusting their popcorn. 🍿
The Punchline
If world politics were judged on plausibility and logic, we’d all be waiting for the interval. Instead, we’re still in Act Two, watching dignitaries reinterpret physics, history and causality like mischievous schoolchildren rewriting the rules of cricket.
So while Abbas Araghchi might sincerely believe protests were plot devices for American intervention, the rest of the global audience is left wondering whether someone’s misplaced their script.
Auf Wiedersehen 🎭
Based on coverage from multiple news outlets including Al Jazeera, The Guardian, Reuters and AP; reports note both official statements and independent sources.
Alan Nafzger was born in Lubbock, Texas, the son Swiss immigrants. He grew up on a dairy in Windthorst, north central Texas. He earned degrees from Midwestern State University (B.A. 1985) and Texas State University (M.A. 1987). University College Dublin (Ph.D. 1991). Dr. Nafzger has entertained and educated young people in Texas colleges for 37 years. Nafzger is best known for his dark novels and experimental screenwriting. His best know scripts to date are Lenin’s Body, produced in Russia by A-Media and Sea and Sky produced in The Philippines in the Tagalog language. In 1986, Nafzger wrote the iconic feminist western novel, Gina of Quitaque. Contact: editor@prat.uk
